USF Logo

C21TE Increments and Transformations Workshop

Home

Ism6013
Ism6155
Ism6217
Ism3232
C21TE

Abstract
Title Increments and Transformations Faculty Workshop
Contact Dr. T. Grandon Gill
ggill@coba.usf.edu
813-974-6755
Principal Investigator Dr. T. Grandon Gill
Department USF Center for 21st Century Teaching Excellence
Brief Description HP mobile technology supplied by grant was used was a week-long workshop, run by USF's Center for 21st Century Teaching Excellence, where 20 faculty membersfrom departments across campus used the Tablet PCs to explore new ways of developing online content (e.g., using Camtasia), new approaches to classroom collaboration (e.g., using Classroom Presenter) and methods of improving teaching productivity (e.g., ink-based grading of electronic submissions, use of OneNote for research). The goal of the seminar was to give faculty participants the tools and knowledge that they would need to implement technology-enabled changes to their teaching activities in the fall semester that followed.

Quick Facts
Courses Impacted 1
Number of Students Involved 21
Number of Faculty Involved 25 (Note: students are faculty in this context)

Rationale

The project is being conducted under the auspices of USF's Center for 21st Century Teaching Excellence (C21TE), as part of its Increments and Transformations Institute (ITI). The ITI's goal is to encourage faculty members from all disciplines to enhance the effectiveness of their teaching through the appropriate use of technologies and pedagogical strategies. Institute participation consists of a year-long cohort-based program of faculty development divided into three distinct phases. In Phase I, participating faculty members attend an intensive week-long workshop on teaching with technology. Phase II takes place during the fall semester that follows, during which time each participant must implement a single technology-based/pedagogically-informed change to one or more courses (a.k.a., an "increment"). During Phase III, in the spring, each participant must share his or her experiences with additional departmental and college colleagues in a formal setting. (See Gill, Patterson and Williams, 2006, "The Increments and Transformation Institute at the University of South Florida", Informing Faculty, v. 1, n. 6)

Historically, a substantial fraction of ITI faculty participants have chosen to incorporate Tablet PC technology into their Phase II increments. When the grant became available, the decision was made to issue each faculty participants (whose number was, quite coincidentally, the same as the number of grant-supplied equipment) a Tablet PC to use for the duration of the week-long Phase I workshop.
The rationale for using the Tablet PC in this way was threefold:

  1. There were numerous synergies that could be exploited between the Tablet PCs and other technologies being presented. For example, faculty members could use the pen and microphone to create highly engaging Camtasia presentations.
  2. Its use as a collaborative tool--particularly using Classroom Presenter (a tool allowing students and instructors to interact with the same presentation) and Elluminate (a synchronous communication tool)--could be demonstrated in the workshop's daily case discussions.
Having access to mobile technology allowed the entire seminar to take place in a seminar room setting, as opposed to requiring participants to travel to a classroom lab for hands-on exposure. In addition, having a full week of 8 hour sessions using the Tablet PC for note taking, hands on training and collaborative activities furnished faculty participants who were interested in using the technology for their own teaching activities with the opportunity to develop substantial skills in using the tool.

Implementation
Pedagogy
Consistent with its goal of enhancing faculty teaching effectiveness and encouraging them to explore new ways to employ technology in a teaching setting, the ITI summer workshop has always been taught using a broad range of techniques. Starting in 2005, the seminar adopted an approach that centered around case studies describing real faculty situations relating to teaching with technology. Specifically, the week long workshop includes the following:

  • Case discussions of actual teaching situations, conducted face-to-face, synchronously online (using Elluminate) and asynchronously online (using Blackboard Discussion groups). Currently, 9 such cases have been developed, and have been published in the journal Informing Faculty)
  • Demonstrations of technologies, with a particular emphasis on those related to the cases being discussed
  • Hands-on exercises in developing content and applying the technologies presented in the workshop
  • Presentations relating to other key issues relating to teaching and learning, not necessarily technology-related.
  • Poster sessions, in which prior workshop participants demonstrated some of the pedagogical changes that they had implemented

The workshop facilitators, which included the PI, the C21TE directors, and instructional design staff, were all skilled in the application in multiple technologies. At any given  time, 4-5 were typically available to answer faculty participant questions, and to assist with hands-on activities.

 

Technology
The Tablet PCs supplied by the grant were used in every aspect of the 2006 week-long ITI summer workshop, and it is anticipated that they will be used in the same manner during summer 2007. Faculty members were given the tablets shortly after arriving on Monday morning, followed by an hour-long session on their use. At the end of each day, the tablets were returned to the cart for recharging. To avoid the need for faculty to keep track of their particular units, each faculty member was also given (to keep) a portable media player that could double as a USB stoarage device, allowing them to save their work at the end of each day and have it available for the next day.
The Tablet PCs were integrated into virtually every aspect of the workshop. Tablet-related technologies actually used by participants included:
  • OneNote, for note taking
  • MS-Word and Acrobat, used to demonstrate grading applications
  • Camtasia Studio, for the development on online content (using ink for emphasis and effect)
  • Answering form-based questionnaires, created with Flashlight Online
  • Elluminate, where the inking technologies dramatically enhanced the effectiveness of the shared whiteboard
  • Classroom Presenter, where case discussions were enhanced by the ability to poll students and ask for short-answer responses

In addition, the potential other potential uses of Tablet PC technology were demonstrated, such as:

  • Generating on-the-fly questions in conjunction with CPS (clicker) technology
  • Linking OneNote documents together wirelessly
  • Using ink in PowerPoint slideshbows (e.g., whiteboards)
As a paper-substitute for reading research and e-books

Impact on Teaching

Traditionally, the ITI workshop has always blended numerous teaching techniques. The objective in the summer 2006 workshop was to blend use of the Tablet PCs--both by the participants and by the facilitators--seamlessly into the activities. Doing so meant employing Tablet PC features in presentations and demonstrations, having the students use the capabilities in their hands on activities, and using collaborative capabilities (as exemplified by Classroom Presenter) to enhance discussions. The goal was not only to introduce participants to the tool's capabilities, it was to allow them to experience how using these capabilities could enhance their own learning (from the perspective of a student) and their own productivity (from the perspective of a faculty member).

As the PI notes:

What is somewhat unusual about this particular use of the HP grant Tablet PCs is that success is to be measured not by what use the instructor makes of the tool, but rather by the degree to which use of the tool induces other faculty members to incorporate Tablet PCs into their own teaching activities


Impact on Student Learning

Because summer 2006 was our fourth ITI cohort, we have a baseline for assessing the effectiveness of the summer workshop. Specifically, we have traditionally used four measures of effectiveness:

  1. The average number of increments implemented by each faculty participant in their teaching activities during the following fall and spring semesters
  2. The average number of technologies employed by each faculty participant in their teaching activities during the following fall and spring semesters
  3. The overall educational impact of the changes implemented by faculty members (a highly qualitative assessment)
  4. Participant assessments of the workshop, gleaned primarily from comments submitted in end-of-workshop evaluations

The first three of these are currently still being assessed for the summer 2006 workshop cohort, which concludes at the end of May. Based on fall and spring cohort presentations, however, it appears that the current cohort is transforming its teaching at a level comparable to that of previous cohorts. With respect to (4), we have already seen a highly positive tone to the comments submitted by participants when the workshop ended.

One Year Ago
In the 2005 cohort, we first began implementing the case-discussion theme in the summer workshop. The cohort results in 1-3 were astoundingly good, with an average of 3.05 increments per faculty member, involving 2.6 technologies (both numbers nearly double those of prior cohorts, as detailed in Gill, Patterson and Williams, 2006). In addition, three of the participants made enhancements so significant that they were chosen to be the keynote speakers in the USF 2006 symposium for teaching with technology. One complaint voiced by many in prior cohorts was the lack of "hands on" opportunities in the workshop. Here we anticipated major benfits from the use of mobile HP technology.
Today

In addition to the qualitative feedback, participants were asked to fill out a voluntary online survey that attempted to measure their reaction to the tool. 85% (17 of 20) chose to participate. Highlights of the survey include:

  • Although 14 of 17 respondents had never tried a Tablet PC before, 3 reported being "quite interested" in acquiring one, 6 were "Extremely Interested" and 2 were "Desperate to acquire one" (in addition, there were 2 respondents that already owned one).
  • Educational activities where the Tablet PC was seen to have particularly strong potential (ratings of 4 or 5, on a 5 point scale from 1=No value added to 5=A great deal of value added) were: note taking (13/17), multimedia development (12/17), grading (9/17) and collaboration with colleagues (7/17).

Another set of questions related to the synergies between Tablet PCs and other technologies presented during the workshop. The results, shown below, suggested that they had developed a strong appreciation of the many ways in which the technology could be applied.


Summer 2006: Applicability of Tablet PCs to selected technologies

Technology

Average

Not at all

Very little

Somewhat

Quite a bit

A great deal

Don't know

Elluminate Live

3.38

[2]

[2]

[4]

[4]

[4]

[1]

Digital Camera

2.62

[1]

[5]

[5]

[2]

[0]

[4]

Podcasts

2.54

[2]

[3]

[7]

[1]

[0]

[4]

Camtasia

4.19

[1]

[2]

[0]

[3]

[10]

[1]

Softchalk

3.86

[1]

[1]

[1]

[7]

[4]

[3]

Blackboard Assignments (Grading)

3.80

[1]

[3]

[2]

[1]

[8]

[2]

Blackboard Groups and Team Sites

3.73

[2]

[2]

[2]

[1]

[8]

[2]

Classroom response units

3.50

[1]

[2]

[4]

[6]

[3]

[1]

OneNote

4.53

[0]

[0]

[3]

[1]

[11]

[2]

One Year From Now
We will be continuing to use the 2006 grant Tablet PCs in the summer 2007 workshop in July which signals the start of Cohort V. One drawback of using the tablets was the frustration mentioned by some faculty participants regarding the fact that we were showing them the technology, but then not giving them access to it. We are currently applying for additional grants--both from HP and other sources--in the hope that we will find a way to make it possible to issue cohort participants their own Tablet PCs for use during the cohort year and beyond. If we are able to acquire such resources, the intention is to develop Tablet-PC specific workshops that faculty participants can attend during the month after the week-long workshop.
Student Comments

Comments from survey at the end of the workshop:

What uses of the Tablet PCs this past week were of greatest value to you?

  • Camtasia presentations
  • annotation of presentation while lecturing
  • No particular value.
  • The use of free hand comments on papers Use of note taking during meetings
  • can't assess
  • In Camptasia, and writing, etc.
  • Note taking
  • The technology such as Camtasia and Elluminate.
  • Without question, being able to write feedback on students' submitted assignments is the single best reason to have one.
  • The ability to write with the stylus in presenter, with the clickers, and navigating camtasia.
  • the ability to write
  • Learning their capabilities;
  • Possible uses for lecturing in large classes that use overhead projection
  • The ability to take notes in OneNote.
  • this week i didn't get the chance to use the tablet features very much.
  • I could comfortably hold it in my lap. The stylus and tablet mode made it easy to play solitaire. All other activities were harder for me because of tablet mode, and I continually switched back to keyboard and wireless mouse.
How should we consider using the Tablet PCs differently in future workshops?

  • Give them to us!
  • N/A
  • can't asssess
  • Start with a tutorial on how to use it effectively
  • I think the use of the tablet PC's was great in this workshop because it allowed us to work along with the presenters and see how the technology worked first hand. I do not have other suggestions for use.
  • More interaction -- watching someone take notes on our tablets, that were also displayed on a screen, felt somewhat redundant.
  • Introduce some of the software that comes with wacom tablets, so could try additional features of tablet.
  • no changes come to mind
  • making them available
  • Not sure because I don't have enough knowledge to suggest.
  • Spend a little bit more time on the first day to introduce the various functions of the pc (how to change orientation, scrolling, etc.)
  • more time playing with software where it could be used.
  • Can't think of anything.
Any other comments or suggestions that you would care to pass on to us

  • Maybe something about advantages or possibilities of tablet pcs for students?
  • None.
  • thanks
  • Tablet PC will be a great tool in large class room presentations, and research presentations.
  • I enjoyed using the Tablet PC and do believe it would be useful.
  • Provide them free to all participants!! :-)
  • HP should consider giving more computers through competitive grant process for educational use so more instructors could have access to them to enhance teaching and learning.
  • no
  • Great tool. I want to learn more about it.
  • i really want to use this with blackboard assignments.
  • They were fun to try out. I'm glad I had real world experience with this so that now I don't have to buy one. It wouldn't be worth the expense for my uses of PC and my work habits. Thanks!

Websites, Presentations and Publications
Web Sites
Case studies: http://informingfaculty.org
USF Center for 21st Century Teaching Excellence: http://www.c21te.usf.edu/

Presentations

  • Finalist, DSI Innovative Curriculum competition (Fall 2006)
  • INSITE Conference, summer 2006
  • AACSB Faculty Learning Workshop (June 2007)
  • Invited book chapter on classroom technologies (forthcoming)

Publications